Why not? Because it was written by someone else, simple as that. Here you will find alternative versions of the news. Why believe us? that’s easy, don’t. Make up your own mind.
The truth is out there, you just need to find it for yourself.
Do you want to contribute to Piereport-
Don't trust anything you hear or read in the media, not even here!. Be the master of your own knowledge & keep an open mind.
PIEREPORT-
PIEREPORT-
Hello all ...
I have been saying for years that if something is part of the global
agenda, it won't take no for an answer. This is a normally fail-
If something is pushed ahead despite public opinion
and against all the evidence, natural justice and common sense then the agenda it
will invariably be. Today, we have a perfect example of this process with what is
being dubbed 'climategate', the exposure of leading scientists for fixing the temperature
records.
Global warming, or 'climate change' as they now call it after temperatures
began to consistently fall, is the most blatantly engineered 'problem', or 'no problem',
and it is simply one gigantic lie. But, as they say, tell a lie often enough and
it becomes accepted truth and, as Hitler point out, the bigger the lie the more people
will believe it.
The 'climate change' propaganda is founded on the myth that temperature
has been increased significantly, and to potentially catastrophic levels, by human-
We had been on a rising trend of solar activity which pushed up average temperatures,
but this has now fallen year on year and therefore so have temperatures. When the
sunspots increase again in the next cycle, temperatures will rise again before falling
as the cycle comes to an end.
This is how it has always been. The end-
By far the biggest contributors to the
greenhouse effect are water vapour and clouds that make up about 96.5% of natural
heat-
Oh yes,
and before carbon dioxide is demonised any more, it is worth remembering that it
is responsible for making plants grow. Without it, and indeed a greenhouse effect
to retain heat, this planet would be uninhabitable. The Illuminati families set out
to create the illusion of potential climate catastrophe to change the face and nature
of global society and impose enormous new taxes together with a police and surveillance
state to enforce new climate laws.
One of the most significant organisations in the
Illuminati environmental agenda is the Club of Rome, founded in 1968. This connects
into the Bilderberg Group, Council on Foreign Relations and Trilateral Commission
network.
These are all Rothschild operations, coordinated by the Round Table secret society
in Britain. The founder of the Club of Rome, Aurelio Peccei, said in the organisation's
1991 publication, The First Global Revolution:
'In searching for a new enemy to unite
us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water
shortages, famine, and the like would fit the Bill ... All of these are caused by
human intervention ... The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.'
The major motivation
of the climate change agenda is to install a world government dictatorship by stealth.
United Nations documents, recently uncovered, detail the plan for global government
introduced via environmental laws and regulations. The vehicle for this is the United
Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), which established the Illuminati-
The problem has been that the climate has not been 'on message'. In October
the dedicated 'global warming' promoters at the BBC suffered great embarrassment
when one its 'Climate Correspondents', Paul Hudson, wrote an article admitting that
temperatures had not increased for eleven years.
The headline on the BBC website
summed it up: 'Whatever happened to global warming?' Hudson quoted Professor Don
Easterbrook from Western Washington University as saying that falling ocean temperatures
virtually assured us that the Earth would be in a cooling phase for some 30 years.
The
desperation to hide the fact that temperatures have been going down has led to the
figures being doctored by scientists all over the world, including some at NASA's
Goddard Institute for Space Studies.
This is headed by the close Al Gore associate, Dr James Hansen. He has been called
'the father of climate change', but should really be called 'the father of the dodgy
data that fuelled the myth of climate change'.
Hansen's NASA Institute announced
that October 2008 was the hottest on record and yet the experience across the world
was of very cold weather and heavy snowstorms. When the obvious inaccuracy of the
NASA figures was questioned it turned out that they had used the figures from the
warmer month of September and said they were for October.
This is highly relevant
because the figures published by Hansen's NASA Institute provide some of the prime
data used by the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to support its line
about global warming and NASA has consistently claimed higher temperatures than other
figures.
It's not the first time Hansen has been caught out, either. In 2007, he
was forced to accept that his claim that the 1990s were the hottest decade of the
20th century wasn't true. It was the 1930s when there was dramatically less carbon
dioxide being produced. Atmospheric scientist Dr John S Theon, one of Hansen's colleagues
at NASA, said:
'Hansen was never muzzled even though he violated NASA's official agency
position on climate forecasting (i.e., we did not know enough to forecast climate
change or mankind's effect on it). Hansen thus embarrassed NASA by coming out with
his claims of global warming in 1988 in his testimony before Congress.'
When you
are serving the Illuminati agenda you are protected and allowed to break the rules
while those challenging your propaganda are pressured to follow the rules to the
letter, or even face new rules to shut them up. This has created a fantastically
distorted perception of what is happening to the climate.
Greenpeace International Executive Director, Gerd Leipold, was forced to admit that
a press release claiming that Arctic ice would disappear by 2030 could not be substantiated,
but he said that he did not apologise for 'emotionalising issues' to get the public
to see the world his way. I think he means that lying is okay so long as people believe
you.
Not only are the icecaps not disappearing, they are getting bigger as temperatures
have been falling. A report published in October said that the Antarctic summer 'melt'
in 2008-
If you want to see the original global temperature
records most cited by the IPCC to check the data that the Climate Cult been using,
well, too bad. They've destroyed them, or 'lost' them.
This happened, just by coincidence,
of course, when the Climatic Research Unit at the UK's University of East Anglia,
one of the global centres for the Climate Cult, was faced with requests to release
them under the Freedom of Information Act.
It had previously refused to release the
raw weather station data and details of its processing methods, except to hand-
Those of us who have been researching this subject for years
have long known that the data was systematically rigged, but the story went onto
a whole new level recently when a hacker accessed thousands of emails and documents
from the Climatic Research Unit computers and exposed beyond question that 'climate
change' has been manufactured by 'scientists' who have coldly set out to deceive
the public.
The emails include communications between prominent climate scientists and reveal
everything from the unethical to the potentially illegal. There was a conspiracy
to block Freedom of Information requests and to keep sceptical scientists out of
the peer review process and scientific publications.
Professor Phil Jones, the head of the 'Research' Unit, has stood down while an investigation
is carried out. One of his emails said: 'I have just completed Mike's Nature trick
of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years to hide the decline'.
Dr
Tim Ball, who spent 30 years in climate science and challenges the official fairytale,
called the revelations 'not just a smoking gun, but a battery of machine guns'.
He
said that on a global scale it was frightening because this group of scientists not
only control the UK Meteorological Office's Hadley Centre, which controls the temperature
data, but they also control the IPCC. In turn, the IPCC is the body that drives government
climate policy around the world.
Hadley Centre propagandaTo complete the circle, the Hadley Centre is co-
Lord Christopher Monckton,
a former policy advisor to British Prime Minister, Margaret Thatcher, and a vehement
critic of the climate change 'orthodoxy', summarises the hacker's findings in a paper
entitled 'Climategate: Caught Green-
- A tiny clique of politicised scientists, paid by unscientific politicians with whom
they were financially and politically linked, were responsible for gathering and
reporting data on temperatures from the palaeoclimate to today's climate. The 'Team',
as they called themselves, were bending and distorting scientific data to fit a nakedly
political story-
line profitable to themselves and congenial to the governments that, these days, pay the bills for 99% of all scientific research. - The Climate Research Unit at East Anglia had profited to the tune of at least $20 million in 'research' grants from the Team's activities.
- The Team had tampered with the complex, bureaucratic processes of the UN's climate panel, the IPCC, so as to exclude inconvenient scientific results from its four Assessment Reports, and to influence the panel's conclusions for political rather than scientific reasons.
- The Team had conspired in an attempt to redefine what is and is not peer-
reviewed science for the sake of excluding results that did not fit what they and the politicians with whom they were closely linked wanted the UN's climate panel to report. - They had tampered with their own data so as to conceal inconsistencies and errors.
- They had expressed dismay at the fact that, contrary to all of their predictions,
global temperatures had not risen in any statistically-
significant sense for 15 years, and had been falling for nine years. They had admitted that their inability to explain it was 'a travesty'. This internal doubt was in contrast to their public statements that the present decade is the warmest ever, and that 'global warming' science is settled. - They had interfered with the process of peer-
review itself by leaning on journals to get their friends rather than independent scientists to review their papers. - They had successfully leaned on friendly journal editors to reject papers reporting results inconsistent with their political viewpoint.
- They had campaigned for the removal of a learned journal's editor, solely because he did not share their willingness to debase and corrupt science for political purposes.
- They had mounted a venomous public campaign of disinformation and denigration of their scientific opponents via a website that they had expensively created.
- Contrary to all the rules of open, verifiable science, the Team had committed the criminal offence of conspiracy to conceal and then to destroy computer codes and data that had been legitimately requested by an external researcher who had very good reason to doubt that their 'research' was either honest or competent.
The emails also refer to their efforts to 'contain' the Medieval Warm Period when
temperatures were higher than they are now with no industrial age carbon dioxide
in the atmosphere.
This is devastating information for the climate change lobby and they have sought
to delete it from climate discussions and the official record. Lord Christopher Monckton,
has said that his own sources confirm this, too. He wrote in the London Sunday Telegraph:
'
... the UN abolished the medieval warm period ... In 1995, David Deming, a geoscientist
at the University of Oklahoma, had written an article reconstructing 150 years of
North American temperatures from borehole data.
He later wrote: "With the publication
of the article in Science, I gained significant credibility in the community of scientists
working on climate change. They thought I was one of them, someone who would pervert
science in the service of social and political causes.
One of them let his guard
down. A major person working in the area of climate change and global warming sent
me an astonishing email that said: 'We have to get rid of the medieval warm period'.
So
they did. The UN's second assessment report, in 1996, showed a 1,000-
The 'hockey-
Even after that, the
UN continued to sell its case using the 'hockey stick' data described by British
writer, Christopher Booker, author of
'Scores of scientific papers show that the medieval warm period was real,
global and up to 3C warmer than now. Then, there were no glaciers in the tropical
Andes: today they're there. There were Viking farms in Greenland: now they're under
permafrost. There was little ice at the North Pole: a Chinese naval squadron sailed
right round the Arctic in 1421 and found none.'
But, as I say, if it's the agenda,
it doesn't take no for an answer. They just bash on regardless of what anyone says
or does. This coming week Barack Obama and an estimated 16,500 politicians, delegates,
activists and reporters will be in Copenhagen for the United Nations Climate Change
Conference.
They will discuss demands to drastically reduce global carbon emissions
while, irony of irony, producing 40,584 tons of carbon dioxide, about the same amount
as the carbon emissions of Morocco in 2006. It includes the use of some 140 aircraft
carrying world leaders, heads of state and so-
All this is taking place
in the midst of the revelations about fixed and manipulated science to give the impression
that something is happening when it is not. The politicians and climate extremists
have once again simply ignored it to maintain business as usual.
Obama will take his teleprompters to the Danish capital and read what he is given
to read. Lies. He will say something close to what he said at the United Nations
in September:'No nation, however large or small, wealthy or poor, can escape the
impact of climate change. Rising sea levels threaten every coastline. More powerful
storms and floods threaten every continent. More frequent drought and crop failures
breed hunger and conflict in places where hunger and conflict already thrive.
On shrinking
islands, families are already being forced to flee their homes as climate refugees.
The security and stability of each nation and all peoples -
Utter tosh. If the system really cared about the planet they would welcome those
who have developed free energy technology that turns natural energy fields in the
atmosphere into usable warmth and power without pollution.
Instead they harass them,
confiscate their technology and documents and some have even been jailed.
Much of
the mainstream media has looked the other way since the 'climategate' scandal broke.
The widespread climate censorship was revealed by the respected British TV news anchor,
Peter Sissons, who left the BBC over the way its 'news' operation was being run.
Sissons said that he was one of only a tiny number of BBC interviewers who had so
much as raised the possibility that there was another side to the debate on climate
change. He said the BBC's most famous 'interrogators' invariably begin by accepting
'the science is settled' when, as he points out, there are countless reputable scientists
that say it isn't. He wrote in the London Mail on Sunday:
'... it is effectively BBC
policy, enthusiastically carried out by the BBC environment correspondents, that
those views should not be heard -
There is no scientific
consensus, only the manufactured appearance of one thanks to the disgraceful excuses-
Sissons recalls
an extraordinary interview that he conducted with the leader of the UK Green Party,
Caroline Lucas, a woman with serious 'climate change' myopia and a religious zealotry
to make everyone conform to her misguided views. I knew her when I was in the party
in the 1980s.
Sissons said he pointed out to Lucas that the climate did not seem
to be 'playing ball' with her claims about rising temperatures caused by carbon dioxide.
He put to her that there had been no warming for ten years, contradicting all the
alarming computer predictions.
Lucas was outraged, he said, and told him it was disgraceful
that the BBC should be giving any kind of publicity to 'those sorts of views'. This
is a lady who heads a party that claims to stand for freedom of speech and information,
but the mind-
They live
in a world of double-
The Climate Cult' is a grotesque alliance
of the governmental and scientific establishment and the 'anti-
The influence of
the greens would be drastically reduced if climate change did not exist in the political
and public mind of so many.
This is why, despite the revelations of 'Climategate',
the climate cultists will be singing from the song sheet in Copenhagen this week
while I have a sick bag very close to hand.
Climate Change
Climate Change is real, it always has been. The climate of the Earth changes, simple.
Is it due to CO2, YOU DECIDE!!! I know what I believe, & it’s not what our leaders are telling us.
Piereport-